On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 07:56:16AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> * Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [150513 16:38]:
> > We can now use generic wakeirq handling and remove the custom handling
> > for the wake-up interrupts.
> 
> How do you prefer to handle the two omap specific serial driver
> changes in this series?
> 
> There's a dependency to Rafael's pm-wakeirq branch that contains:
> 
> 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling")
> 56f487c78015 ("PM / Runtime: Update last_busy in rpm_resume")
> f6a2fbb903d5 ("PM / runtime: add note about re-calling in during
> device probe()")
> 
> The 8250_omap.c driver change also needs to be merged with:
> 
> 9e91597f2423 ("serial: 8250_omap: provide complete custom startup &
> shutdown callbacks")
> 
> Not sure if 9e91597f2423 is immutable, but if so then I could:
> 
> a) Send you a pull request for the two serial driver patches
>    based on Rafael's pm-wakeirq branch merged with 9e91597f2423 to
>    avoid the merge conflict.
> 
> b) Apply both serial driver patches into omap-for-v4.2/wakeirq
>    based on Rafael's pm-wakeirq branch merged with 9e91597f2423.

That one sounds good to me, feel free to do so and add:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

It's the easiest for everyone involved, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to