Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 09:22 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> stil thinking about it.  These messages have made it easy to catch bugs 
>> with the PM code in the past (e.g., sad2d).  Making them debug-level will 
>> require booting a kernel with clock debugging specifically 
>> compiled in.  So I wonder if there might be a better way to deal with 
>> these...
>
> Yeah, I see your concern. I'm your user, and from my perspective this is
> an excessive output to slow serial line.
>
> If you do not want re-compilation, I may send a different patch
> like this:
>
> -     printk(KERN_INFO "Disabling unused clock \"%s\"\n", clk->name);
> +     printk(KERN_DEBUG "Disabling unused clock \"%s\"\n", clk->name);
>
> in which case you would not loose the messages, but the messages
> would not go to the serial line.
>

I prefer this method as well since i can see them simply by adding
debug to the cmdline.

Kevin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to