> - if (twl_has_keypad() && pdata->keypad) {
> + if (twl_has_keypad() && pdata->keypad &&
> + !(features & TLW6030)) {
> child = add_child(2, "twl4030_keypad",
> pdata->keypad, sizeof(*pdata->keypad),
> true, pdata->irq_base + 1, 0);
>
> You'd probably only need to make changes to register defines but almost
> everything else could remain as is. There shouldn't be any need for
> creating separate files.
>
Patch 0, of the series explains the differences between TWL4030 and TWL6030.
Going the aforesaid way, we will need checks like this in almost every other
line of code. And I believe having a separate file would be more modular, and
hence readable (a twl.c which will bind with twl4030-core.c and twl4030-irq.c
if TWL4030 is selected, and twl6030-core.c and twl6030-irq.c if TWL6030 is
selected).
I am not sure how we can incorporate all the hardware changes by just changing
register addresses.
--
Jagadeesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
