________________________________
From: Jarkko Nikula [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:06 PM
To: Shilimkar, Santosh
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: sDMA: Correct the the omap_request_dma_chain()
signature
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh
<[email protected]> wrote:
Yor tow comments....I think I answered both.....Just a
correction you comment itself.
> > You mean callback gets lch instead of chain_id as an
argument?
You mean callback **** returns *** lch instead of chain_id as
an argument?
I mean argument passed to the callback. Callback is void so not
returning anything.
if (likely(dma_chan[ch].callback != NULL))
dma_chan[ch].callback(ch, status, dma_chan[ch].data);
My ***return ** was from the dma user point of view and not the
fucntion return :). Anyway the point is callback first argument is dma channel
nubmer and not chain_id. So User will get the channel number and not chain_id
via callback.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
