* Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> [151208 02:26]: > On Tuesday 08 December 2015 12:22:09 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > On 12/08/2015 11:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 08 December 2015 09:42:26 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > >> On 12/04/2015 11:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Please just drop the /bits/ 16 and use normal cells. > > >>> > > >>> Yeah agreed, makes things less confusing for sure > > >> > > >> 4.4 will be the first kernel where we will have the new eDMA bindings. I > > >> have > > >> chosen to use 16bit array for specifying the channels used for memcpy > > >> (ti,edma-memcpy-channels) and for the reserving paRAM slots > > >> (ti,edma-reserved-slot-ranges). As of now we have maximum of 64 channels > > >> and > > >> 512 paRAM slots. 16bit is more than enough to store this information and > > >> it > > >> even gives us enough room if ever in the future these numbers are going > > >> to > > >> increase (which they are not). > > >> > > >> But in order to change them to 32bit the driver needs to be changed as > > >> well. > > >> Currently we do not have drivers (in 4.4) using the new bindings, 4.4 is > > >> not > > >> yet out, so it might be possible to change the binding document and the > > >> driver > > >> to use 32bit arrays. The driver internally uses 16bit type for these > > >> which I'm > > >> not going to change, but the code parsing the DT needs to be adjusted > > >> for the > > >> new data type. > > >> > > >> If Vinod is willing to take update for the DT binding of eDMA for > > >> 4.4-rc, I > > >> can cook up the patch(es) to do so. > > > > > > I hadn't realized that it was already in 4.4-rc. The change should be > > > trivial > > > enough though, so I'd still do it. If Vinod would rather not change it > > > now, > > > it's not overly important though. > > > > But this change must be done before we have actual users of these > > properties, > > which is the am33xx, am437x and the da850 conversion series I have sent > > recently. > > We might want to have this changed for 4.4 since it is going to be an LTS > > release... > > Yes, that's what I meant: We either get the patch into 4.4 by creating a > branch for Vinod to pull with this change, and base all other changes in your > 4.5 series on the same branch, or we don't change it at all.
Sounds good to me. If there's an immutable branch against v4.4-rc1 with just that change in it will make our lives easier. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
