* Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> [160102 06:14]: > Hello, > > now I'm looking at differences between legacy board code and DTS file > for Nokia N900 and I see some inconsistency for twl4030-power driver. > > In board code are defined more twl4030 power scripts which override > defaults defined in twl4030-power code. See: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c#n790 > > Next in DTS file is defined just "compatible" keyword, but no custom > scripts, see: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts#n416 > > And the last in DTS file is defined line: > > compatible = "ti,twl4030-power-n900" > > which is not in twl4030-power driver itself, see: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c#n851 > > So all this stuff looks like some errors when board code was ported to > DTS. Tony, can you look at this at all?
AFAIK it should work fine with the generic "ti,twl4030-power-idle-osc-off". This means reboot works and regulators are cut off during off mode. The n900 specific code was based on something before the TI generic values were available I think. And the last time I looked at it I came to the conclusion the n900 specific code is no better. Or did I miss something? Are you seeing some issues with PM with dts based code? We can certainly add it to twl4030-power if it provides something that the "ti,twl4030-power-idle-osc-off" does not. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html