On Thu, 14 May 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote: > > Also when reviewing the timing calculations, it appears that the lowest > > speed > > setting had an error in its autorefresh counter value. I don't know if > > anything out there still uses this low-speed setting - my recollection is > > that it was added for some early Labrador boards that had speed > > restrictions - > > any comments from TI on whether these 133.3MHz/66.6MHz rates should be > > dropped > > is most welcome. > > Alpha LDP board had only 133MHz rated memory on them. These were quickly > replaced with beta then production boards with 166MHz rated memory. > > Probably only a few dumpsters at TI have 133MHz restricted alpha boards (and > maybe at logicpd). I don’t' think you will even find an alpha in plastics. > > Nothing stops a person from running at 133 on the 166 rated parts. But most > won't choose to on a 3430.
Great, thanks Richard. Will add a patch to drop those rates... - Paul
