> From: Shilimkar, Santosh
>
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-omap-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> >
> > * Mark Brown <[email protected]> [090803 17:23]:
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:06:13AM +0530, [email protected] wrote:
> > >
> > > > - if (twl_has_regulator()) {
> > > > + if (twl_has_regulator() && is_class_twl4030()) {
> > >
> > > is_class_twl4030() feels like it should have better namespacing, though
> > > having the part name in there means it's not actually an issue.
> >
> > How about twl_is_4030()?
> The idea was to have a class of twl4030 IC's type IC's. There are many of them
> with just different name (TPS *)
> ... twl_class_is_4030().... What you say ?
twl_class_is_4030 should return TRUE for twl4030 / twl5030 / tps65950 /
tps65930 / tps65920
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
