Hi Ameya,
I have tested your patches, and the first tests run very well and also
the memory leaks due to we had only one hprocessor and we lost the other ones
disappeared. Thank you so much for the patches; just a few comments please see
my comments on the patches. It would be great if you could divide the patches
in functional patches and not divided in module patches. Something like one
patch for the Wrappers, other for the change of bridge cleanup and other one by
the list of processor object.
Regards,
Fernando.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ameya Palande [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Ramirez Luna, Omar; Guzman Lugo, Fernando; Moogi,
Suyog; [email protected]; Ramos Falcon, Ernesto
Subject: DSPBRIDGE: Tie Resource accounting to Process Context
This patch series uses filp->private data to get access to a PROCESS_CONTEXT
pointer which in turn tracks all the resources tied to an open file handle.
This will help in:
1. Implementation of clean resource accounting.
2. Proper resource cleanup irrespective of multithreading or multitasking in
user space applications.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
