From: "ext C.A, Subramaniam" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/10] omap mailbox: OMAP4-Mailbox - Add build specific changes to support OMAP4 mailbox. Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:27:22 +0200
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: C A Subramaniam <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Ramesh Gupta G <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 4 ++++ > > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile index 735bae5..4bb426d 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > > > @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ endif > > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += clock24xx.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += clock34xx.o > > > > > > +# MAILBOX > > > > I think that the above line is not necessary since the module > > names are enough self-explanatory, a little bit nitpicky, though.... > > I have followed the existing convention present in the Makefile (Power > management, clock framework,etc.) as follows: > > # Power Management > ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM),y) > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += pm24xx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX) += sleep24xx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += pm34xx.o sleep34xx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG) += pm-debug.o > endif > > # Clock framework > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += clock24xx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += clock34xx.o > > Please let me know if you still believe that the line needs to be removed. I understand that you followed kind of convention, but I still think that these comments don't make so much sense since these module names are apparently enough self-explanatory. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
