Hi Subbu,
From: "ext C.A, Subramaniam" <subramaniam...@ti.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 10/10] omap mailbox: OMAP4 Mailbox-driver Patch to support
tasklet implementation
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 19:43:48 +0200
[...]
> > As I described in the comment on [PATCH 8/10], I think that
> > it would be better to keep "mach-omap2/mailbox.c" simple and
> > to add some additional logic on "plat-omap/mailbox.c".
> >
> > Would it be possbile to move this tasklet implementation to
> > "plat-omap/mailbox.c"?
>
> The implementation of the tasklet itself is maintained in plat-omap/mailbox.c
> Since, I wanted to maintain a separate tasklet for each mailbox
> instance used to send messages from MPU, I had to associate the the tasklet
> to the mailbox. Hence, the changes were done in mach-omap2/mailbox.c
>
> Please give your comments on this approach.
Wouldn't just converting work_queue to tasklet work like below?
(I havne't tested this at all, though...)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/mailbox.h
b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/mailbox.h
index b7a6991..1f4e53e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/mailbox.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/mailbox.h
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ struct omap_mbox {
struct omap_mbox_queue *txq, *rxq;
+ struct tasklet_struct tx_tasklet;
+
struct omap_mbox_ops *ops;
mbox_msg_t seq_snd, seq_rcv;
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
index 40424ed..37267ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
@@ -184,22 +184,17 @@ int omap_mbox_msg_send(struct omap_mbox *mbox, mbox_msg_t
msg, void* arg)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap_mbox_msg_send);
-static void mbox_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void mbox_tx_tasklet(unsigned long data)
{
int ret;
struct request *rq;
- struct omap_mbox_queue *mq = container_of(work,
- struct omap_mbox_queue, work);
- struct omap_mbox *mbox = mq->queue->queuedata;
+ struct omap_mbox *mbox = (struct omap_mbox *)data;
struct request_queue *q = mbox->txq->queue;
while (1) {
struct omap_msg_tx_data *tx_data;
- spin_lock(q->queue_lock);
rq = blk_fetch_request(q);
- spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
-
if (!rq)
break;
@@ -208,15 +203,10 @@ static void mbox_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
ret = __mbox_msg_send(mbox, tx_data->msg, tx_data->arg);
if (ret) {
enable_mbox_irq(mbox, IRQ_TX);
- spin_lock(q->queue_lock);
blk_requeue_request(q, rq);
- spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
return;
}
-
- spin_lock(q->queue_lock);
__blk_end_request_all(rq, 0);
- spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
}
}
@@ -266,7 +256,7 @@ static void __mbox_tx_interrupt(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
{
disable_mbox_irq(mbox, IRQ_TX);
ack_mbox_irq(mbox, IRQ_TX);
- schedule_work(&mbox->txq->work);
+ tasklet_schedule(&mbox->tx_tasklet);
}
static void __mbox_rx_interrupt(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
@@ -434,7 +424,9 @@ static int omap_mbox_init(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
goto fail_request_irq;
}
- mq = mbox_queue_alloc(mbox, mbox_txq_fn, mbox_tx_work);
+ tasklet_init(&mbox->tx_tasklet, mbox_tx_tasklet, (unsigned long)mbox);
+
+ mq = mbox_queue_alloc(mbox, mbox_txq_fn, NULL);
if (!mq) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto fail_alloc_txq;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
