Daniel Walker <[email protected]> writes:

> I was using Coccinelle with the mutex_unlock semantic patch, and it
> unconvered this problem. It appears to be a valid missing unlock issue.
> This change should correct it by moving the unlock below the label.
>
> This patch is against the mainline kernel.
>
> Cc: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>

> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> index 57f7122..9b6cb90 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> @@ -363,8 +363,9 @@ void *da_to_va(struct iommu *obj, u32 da)
>               goto out;
>       }
>       va = area->va;
> -     mutex_unlock(&obj->mmap_lock);
>  out:
> +     mutex_unlock(&obj->mmap_lock);
> +
>       return va;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(da_to_va);
> -- 
> 1.6.0.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to