>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shilimkar, Santosh
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-
>> omap/include/mach/cpu.h
>> index 431fec4..af1080f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
>> @@ -383,6 +383,12 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
>> #define OMAP3430_REV_ES2_1 0x34302034
>> #define OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0 0x34303034
>> #define OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1 0x34304034
>> +/* NOTE: Add 36xx series below
>> + * If additional 34xx series are added, OMAP3430_REV_ESXXXX can be
>> + * added above the 3630 defines and series renumbered to ensure
>> + * rev() > checks to work
>> + */
>> +#define OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0 0x34305034
>>
>> #define OMAP443X_CLASS 0x44300034
>Was expecting that this patch will add "cpu_is_omap36xx()" in cpu.h
>apart from above. Is this handled in another patch ?
Idea is to re-use all 34xx code for 36xx, as per the mail thread on list, and
given in reference.
Hence at run time, the check could be:
if (omap_rev() == OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0)
xxxxx
cpu_is_omap34xx() will be true for 36xx as well.
>
>
>Regards,
>Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
