* Madhusudhan Chikkature <[email protected]> [091022 10:38]: > From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Madhu <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks. > > Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition and > mux configuration for HSMMC1/2. > > Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++-- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct > omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller, > } > } > > - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) { > + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) { > if (controller_nr == 0) { > omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK); > omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future proof. Regards, Tony > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct omap_mmc_platform_data > **mmc_data, > irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ; > break; > case 2: > - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()) > + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx() > + && !cpu_is_omap3630()) > return; > base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE; > irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ; > -- > 1.6.0.4 > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
