Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:42:07PM +0100, ext Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:40:04PM +0100, ext Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
> > > > case 0xb891:
> > > > - /* Handle 36xx devices */
> > > > - switch (rev) {
> > > > - case 0:
> > > > - omap_revision = OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0;
> > > > - break;
> > > > - default:
> > > > - /* Use the latest known revision as default */
> > > > - omap_revision = OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0;
> > > > - }
> > > > - break;
> > > > + /* FALLTHROUGH */
> > > > default:
> > > > /* Unknown default to latest silicon rev as default*/
> > > > omap_revision = OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0;
> > >
> > > [sp] Haven't applied the patch. But, if FALLTHROUGH will
> > make the device
> > > detected as OMAP3630, then it may not be right. The
> > fall through
> > > should be on most common device. OMAP3430 ES21./3.1
> > should be ideal.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > see that I didn't change the default clause. It was already
> > OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0. If it has to be anything else, the
> > default should be
> > changed and the case 0xb891: should do:
>
> I did see that. But since you were already proposing a change
> thought it would be good idea.
if Tony says it's ok, I can change the patch, for sure :-)
but I believe he will want that as a separate patch for bisectability.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
