Hi,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:23:14AM +0100, ext Candelaria Villareal, Jorge wrote:
Is this because if two interrupts were set, my approach would
not recognize it as one of the cases and exit without processing
the interrupt?
you don't have a break in your switch. your approach would go through
all irq cases no matter what :-p
what ? so even if you don't have a platform_device you register the
driver ??
So, it would be better if I had declared a platform_device structure
in .../arch/arm/plat-omap/devices.c, and register its resources (irq
and memory base) in there?
IMO yeah. It would look cleaner. But McBSP is the same mess so I don't
know what the ALSA people will say. Jarkko Nikula probably has some
ideas as he did most of the OMAP ASoC implementation.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
