On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Venkatraman S wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Venkatraman S <svenk...@ti.com> [091211 07:01]:
>>>>
>>>> Here is the most updated version of the patch (thanks to Russell's
>>>> review). This patch is applicable to OMAP4xxx as well as OMAP3630
>>>> Reference to previous posts
>>>> v1 http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=125012097403050&w=2
>>>> v2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=125137152606644&w=2
>>>> v3 http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45408/
>>>
>>> Do you have a patch for drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c to
>>> use this feature? Or some other driver?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tony
>>
>> I am about to start working on omap_hsmmc to use the descriptor load
>> feature. If the DMA changes are acceptable, I can post the driver
>> patch as well.
>
> I presume this is about performance. How does it compare to chained DMA?
> We have a patch for omap_hsmmc for chained DMA that we are still testing.
>
The main difference would be the number of logical channels used.
With chaining, I assume you'd request for (or the API internally
reserves) as many logical channels as there are segments. Here a
single logical channel would do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
