>From: Menon, Nishanth > >Ramirez Luna, Omar had written, on 01/08/2010 10:48 AM, the following: >>> From: Menon, Nishanth >>> >>> Ramirez Luna, Omar had written, on 01/07/2010 07:00 PM, the following: >>>> Include dspbridge compilation whenever bridge driver is selected to >>>> be compiled, either as a module or part of the kernel. This will >>>> initialize platform data specific PM functions. >>> ?? are you intending to state that dspbridge.c can now not be a module? >> >> Yes, if bridge is selected it will include dspbridge as part of the kernel, >> leaving bridgedriver to >be installed depending on selected option (module or built in) >> >>> can you elaborate more as to why? >> >> Lately EXPORT_SYMBOL has been removed from pm functions, bridge depends on >> those symbols and now >that they can't be resolved at runtime (or insmod time), then dspbridge driver >needs to be compiled >as part of the kernel to resolve them on its platform data structure, >otherwise linking will break. > >might be good to know what these functions are and why they need to be >exported. we could see how the community thinks about exporting those >APIs. further, I thought your branch was based on l-o and not l-o pm. am >I wrong?
Branch is based on l-o, but I'm trying to keep the less differences between l-o-pm version... as of now since DVFS doesn't exists on l-o, this problem is not shown, but bridge version based on l-o-pm has it. > >> >>>> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.rami...@ti.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 4 +++- >>>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile >>>> index d1cf986..0881470 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile >>>> @@ -75,7 +75,9 @@ obj-y += >>>> $(i2c-omap-m) $(i2c-omap-y) >>>> # Debobs >>>> obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP3_DEBOBS) += debobs.o >>> ?? I dont find this in l-o master/2.6.32.. something I am missing? > >You never answered this.is your patch based on PM branch? Sorry, yes this version of the patch is based on PM, must have confused both versions. I'll resend master/2.6.32 which should change this reference lines... Btw why do we have this "debobs" on l-o-pm and not on l-o? > >>> >>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_MPU_BRIDGE) += dspbridge.o >>>> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_MPU_BRIDGE),) >>>> +obj-y += dspbridge.o >>>> +endif >>>> # Specific board support >>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_GENERIC) += board-generic.o >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Nishanth Menon > > >-- >Regards, >Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
