Just to be clear, my post was in response to the reported problems
with enabling sdio irqs with this patch:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69122/

The patch originator reported good results but others reported
complete failure.  My hack fixed the problem for me.  I believe this
much more modest patch will also fix the problem but it is untested
because I don't have a board running right now.  Beware, I'm sending
this from gmail so it may get line wrapped but it is a trivial patch
so I think it is understandable.

John

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
index fa94580..7af970e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
@@ -1727,10 +1727,16 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe

        omap_hsmmc_context_save(host);

+#if 0
        mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DISABLE;
        mmc_set_disable_delay(mmc, OMAP_MMC_DISABLED_TIMEOUT);
        /* we start off in DISABLED state */
        host->dpm_state = DISABLED;
+#else
+       /* we start off in ENABLED state */
+       host->dpm_state = ENABLED;
+       clk_enable(host->fclk);
+#endif

        if (mmc_host_enable(host->mmc) != 0) {
                clk_put(host->iclk);


On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Madhusudhan <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is hard to comment on what is happening here without a patch. Is it a
> performance issue or that SDIO functionality failure with PM enabled?
>
> The MMC controller supports wakeup capability on the dat1 line using a GPIO
> for a SDIO interrupt. I guess that should help.
>
> Regards,
> Madhu
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to