> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:25 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap3: cpuidle: Update statistics 
> for correct state
> 
> Sanjeev Premi <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > When 'enable_off_mode' is 0, the target power state for MPU
> > and CORE was locally changed to PWRDM_POWER_RET but, the
> > statistics are updated for idle state originally selected
> > by the governor.
> >
> > This patch 'invalidates' the idle states that lead either of
> > MPU or Core to PWRDM_POWER_OFF state when 'enable_off_mode'
> > is '0'. The states are valid once 'enable_off_mode' is set
> > to '1'.
> >
> > Added function next_valid_state() to check if current state
> > is valid; else get the next valid state. It is called from
> > omap3_enter_idle_bm().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi <[email protected]>
> 
> Hi Sanjeev,
> 
> I quite like this approach, but have a few minor comments.  First,
> please fix the checkpatch errors and warnings, as well as a few minor
> things below...
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c |   98 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h          |    1 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c      |    4 ++
> >  3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> > index fdfa1d5..308865c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
> >  #define OMAP3_STATE_C6 5 /* C6 - MPU OFF + Core RET */
> >  #define OMAP3_STATE_C7 6 /* C7 - MPU OFF + Core OFF */
> >  
> > +#define OMAP3_STATE_MAX OMAP3_STATE_C7
> > +
> >  struct omap3_processor_cx {
> >     u8 valid;
> >     u8 type;
> > @@ -128,13 +130,6 @@ static int omap3_enter_idle(struct 
> cpuidle_device *dev,
> >     local_irq_disable();
> >     local_fiq_disable();
> >  
> > -   if (!enable_off_mode) {
> > -           if (mpu_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> > -                   mpu_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> > -           if (core_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> > -                   core_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> > -   }
> > -
> >     pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pd, mpu_state);
> >     pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pd, core_state);
> >  
> > @@ -164,6 +159,65 @@ return_sleep_time:
> >     return (u32)timespec_to_ns(&ts_idle)/1000;
> >  }
> >  
> > +
> > +/* next_valid_state - Find next valid c-state
> > + * @dev: cpuidle device
> > + * @state: Currently selected c-state
> > + *
> > + * If the current state is valid, it is returned back to 
> the caller.
> > + * Else, this function searches for a lower c-state which is still
> > + * valid (as defined in omap3_power_states[]).
> > + */
> 
> Please fix kerneldoc style.   Opening comment should be '/**'
> 
> > +static struct cpuidle_state* next_valid_state(struct 
> cpuidle_device *dev,
> > +                                           struct 
> cpuidle_state *curr)
> > +{
> > +   struct cpuidle_state *next = NULL;
> > +   struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
> > +
> > +   cx = (struct omap3_processor_cx *)cpuidle_get_statedata(curr);
> > +
> > +   /* Check if current state is valid */
> > +   if (cx->valid) {
> > +           next = curr;
> 
> could just return curr here
> 
> > +   }
> > +   else {
> > +           u8 idx = OMAP3_STATE_MAX;
> > +
> > +           /* Reach the current state starting at highest 
> C-state */
> > +           for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
> > +                   if (&dev->states[idx] == curr) {
> > +                           next = &dev->states[idx];
> > +                           break;
> > +                   }
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           /*
> > +            * Should never hit this condition.
> > +            */
> > +           BUG_ON(next == NULL);
> 
> This shouldn't trigger a panic.  Please fail more cleanly 
> using WARN_ON()
> 
> > +           /* Drop to next valid state.
> > +            * Start search from the next (lower) state.
> > +            */
> 
> fix multiline comment.  Should start with '/*' on its own line.
> (c.f. Documentation/CodingStyle, search for 'multi-line')
> 
> > +           idx--;
> > +           for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
> > +                   if (((struct omap3_processor_cx *)
> > +                           cpuidle_get_statedata(
> > +                                   &dev->states[idx]))->valid) {
> > +                           next = &dev->states[idx];
> > +                           break;
> > +                   }
> > +           }
> 
> Due to line-wrapping etc., this has readabiliyt problems.  
> Consider this
> instead:
> 
>               for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
>                       struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
> 
>                       cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(&dev->states[idx]);
>                       if (cx->valid) {
>                               next = &dev->states[idx];
>                               break;
>                       }
>               }
> 
> > +           /*
> > +            * C1 and C2 are always valid.
> > +            * So, no need to check for 'next==NULL' 
> outside this loop.
> > +            */
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return next;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * omap3_enter_idle_bm - Checks for any bus activity
> >   * @dev: cpuidle device
> > @@ -176,7 +230,7 @@ return_sleep_time:
> >  static int omap3_enter_idle_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> >                            struct cpuidle_state *state)
> >  {
> > -   struct cpuidle_state *new_state = state;
> > +   struct cpuidle_state *new_state= next_valid_state(dev, state);
>                                        ^
> 
> missing space
> 
> >  
> >     if ((state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM) && 
> omap3_idle_bm_check()) {
> >             BUG_ON(!dev->safe_state);
> > @@ -207,6 +261,32 @@ void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct 
> cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
> >     return;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * omap3_cpuidle_update_states - Update the cpuidle states.
> > + *
> > + * Currently, this function toggles the validity of idle 
> states based upon
> > + * the flag 'enable_off_mode'. When the flag is set all 
> states are valid.
> > + * Else, states leading to OFF state set to be invalid.
> > + */
> > +void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void)
> > +{
> > +   int i;
> > +
> > +   for (i = OMAP3_STATE_C1; i < OMAP3_MAX_STATES; i++) {
> > +           if (enable_off_mode) {
> > +                   omap3_power_states[i].valid = 1;
> > +           }
> > +           else {
> > +                   if ((omap3_power_states[i].mpu_state
> > +                                   == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> > +                           || (omap3_power_states[i].core_state
> > +                                   == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
> > +                   omap3_power_states[i].valid = 0;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +}
> 
> more readability problems due to wrapping.  consider:
> 
> void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void)
> {
>       int i;
> 
>       for (i = OMAP3_STATE_C1; i < OMAP3_MAX_STATES; i++) {
>               struct omap3_processor_cx *cx = &omap3_power_states[i]
> 
>               if (enable_off_mode)
>                       cx->valid = 1;
>               else
>                       if ((cx->mpu_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) ||
>                           (cx->core_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
>                               cx->valid = 0;
>       }
> }
> 
> Kevin

Thanks for comments Kevin.

Updated just started to test the updated patch. Will be posting soon.

Best regards,
Sanjeev

> 
> 
> > +
> >  /* omap3_init_power_states - Initialises the OMAP3 
> specific C states.
> >   *
> >   * Below is the desciption of each C state.
> > @@ -365,6 +445,8 @@ int __init omap3_idle_init(void)
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >     dev->state_count = count;
> >  
> > +   omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
> > +
> >     if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
> >             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: CPUidle register device failed\n",
> >                    __func__);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > index b9421e8..9351490 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct cpuidle_params {
> >  extern void omap3_pm_init_vc(struct prm_setup_vc *setup_vc);
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> >  extern void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_params 
> *cpuidle_board_params);
> > +extern void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void);
> >  #else
> >  static inline void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(
> >                     struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > index 90c4949..d9f0626 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > @@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ void omap3_pm_off_mode_enable(int enable)
> >     else
> >             state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> > +   omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_SRF
> >     resource_lock_opp(VDD1_OPP);
> >     resource_lock_opp(VDD2_OPP);
> > -- 
> > 1.6.2.2
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-omap" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to