> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote: >> * Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> [100209 14:38]: >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote: >>> > * Hemanth V <heman...@ti.com> [100203 02:19]: >>> >> From ee48142ddc43129a21676dbb56a83e3e7d8063de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> >> From: Hemanth V <heman...@ti.com> >>> >> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:22:30 +0530 >>> >> Subject: [PATCH] Update platform files >>> >> >>> >> This patch updates platform files for >>> >> fifo, slave support >>> >> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Hemanth V <heman...@ti.com> >>> > >>> > This should get merged via the spi-devel list with the other patches. >>> > >>> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> >>> >>> Personally, I prefer not to carry arch/* changes in my next-spi >>> branch, since it means that my pull requests are less obvious for >>> Linus and there is greater chance of conflict. >>> >>> But if you still really want me to merge it through my tree, (or if >>> getting the patches out of order will break things) then I'll pick it >>> up. Just let me know. >> >> OK, if you ack it, I'll add the header into omap for-next. That >> might break git bisect for some configurations depending in which >> order the patches get pulled by Linus.. > > git bisect breakage is breakage enough. :-) You're right. I should > pick this one up. I can see that now that I've had my tea and I'm no > longer grumpy. > >> I guess eventually this header should not live under plat. > > Any reason the header cannot be moved to include/linux/spi/ now?
Quite a few board files use this header file, which would also require changes. Tony, are you ok with accepting changes to board files. Thanks Hemanth > > g. > > -- > Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. > Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
