Thara Gopinath <th...@ti.com> writes: > As per the current implementaion (u8*)&target_level is being passed > to freq_to_opp in set_opp. This would result in updating just the first > 8 bits of a u32 variable. Later target_level is passed to > resource_set_opp_level as a u32 parameter. This maens > a. Initially target_level was 0xabcdefgh. > b. freq_to_opp updates the lower eight bits of target_level > to 0xXX. Now target_level = 0xabcdefXX. > c. We pass 0xabcdefXX as target_level to resource_set_opp_level > when we want to pass just 0xXX. > This is leading to some corrupted bookkeeping later on in the > dvfs path. > > This patch ensures that target_level passed to resource_set_opp_level > is actually the level that is intended by freq_to_opp API. > > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <th...@ti.com> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>
Thanks, applying to pm-wip-opp after cleaning up the formatting in the changelog to be a little more readable. Kevin > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c > index 3604a38..2c850a2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c > @@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ int set_opp(struct shared_resource *resp, u32 > target_level) > /* uh uh.. no OPPs?? */ > BUG_ON(IS_ERR(oppx)); > > + target_level = 0; > ret = freq_to_opp((u8 *)&target_level, OPP_L3, req_l3_freq); > /* we dont expect this to fail */ > BUG_ON(ret); > -- > 1.5.4.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
