On 25 Feb 2010, at 00:24, "Olaya, Margarita" <[email protected]> wrote:



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Brown [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:59 AM
To: Olaya, Margarita
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 7/7] ASoC: TWL6030: Detect power-up sequence completion

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:10:54PM -0600, Olaya, Margarita wrote:

+    if (naudint) {
+        /* wait for ready interrupt with 48 ms timeout */
+        time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->ready,
+                    msecs_to_jiffies(48));
+    } else {
+        /* retry 3 times only */
+        for (time_left = 3; time_left > 0; time_left--) {
+            mdelay(16);
+            twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_AUDIO_VOICE, &intid,
+                    TWL6030_REG_INTID);
+            if (intid & TWL6030_READYINT)
+                break;
+        }
+    }

It strikes me that you could combine these two cases - the
wait_for_completion_timeout() will function just as well as a delay.
I'd also expect to see an error reported if the device doesn't report as
ready one way or another.

It is split to prevent the case of none valid irq line connected, in such case, wait_for_completion won't work

It will - you can specify a timeout so if the interrupt doesn't happen all that happens is that you delay for the specified timeout.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to