Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 12:20:05 schrieb Gupta, Ajay Kumar: Hello,
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Oliver Neukum [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 4:33 PM > > To: Gupta, Ajay Kumar > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] musb: Add workqueue for URB giveback > > > > Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 11:39:06 schrieb Ajay Kumar Gupta: > > > +struct queue *create(void) > > > +{ > > > + struct queue *new; > > > + new = kmalloc(sizeof(struct queue), GFP_ATOMIC); > > > + if (!new) > > > + return NULL; > > > + new->next = NULL; > > > + return new; > > > +} > > > +void push_queue(struct musb *musb, struct urb *urb) > > > +{ > > > + struct queue *new, *temp; > > > + > > > + new = create(); > > > + new->urb = urb; > > > > And you happily follow the NULL pointer in the error case. > > I will put the NULL check here and also during push_queue(). In case > Of memory allocation failure I can giveback the URB right away. If you do that you'll give back URBs out of order. Now I don't know whether this is defined as something you mustn't do, bad it is not a good idea. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
