* [email protected] <[email protected]> [100309 00:20]:
> >
> >Changes in wakeup state should not be directly correlated to interrupt
> >enabled GPIOs.  Rather, this should only be done for GPIOs that are
> >explicitly wakeup enabled (via enable_irq_wake(), which in turn
> >calls gpio_wake_enable()).
> 
> This logic somehow escapes me... I would guess drivers should not care during 
> dynamic idle whether the device is in off/ret/ina and interrupts should just 
> work. This is done to make this happen. Also, I understood that gpio wakeup 
> logic is needed for the suspend wakeup, which is quite different from dynamic 
> idle wakeup.
> 
> However, if this is intended behavior for the kernel, then I will accept it. 
> You are saying the code below should be moved into the gpio_wake_enable() / 
> disable() calls?

I agree. I'd assume during the idle modes we want everything to
automatically wake the system up. Otherwise we again have non-standard
Linux behaviour that's mysterious to track down. The enable_irq_wake
should only be needed for suspend states.
 
> >This change isn't explained in the changelog and appears unrelated to
> >this patch.
> 
> The reason for this change is that we need the gpio->pad mapping early now to 
> enable wakeups properly. Otherwise some components can enable gpio interrupts 
> early in the boot cycle and they will miss their wakeup setting because the 
> map does not exist yet. I think another way to do this would be to enable 
> wakeups for all enabled interrupts during the omap3_gpio_pads_init().

Don't have the original patch, but it smells like you're trying
to do gpio to mux register mapping?

If so, your already have that available via omap_mux_get/set_gpio()
for 34xx in the new muxcode already in mainline. Those work even
if you don't have CONFIG_OMAP_MUX set.

And I still need to convert 24xx to the new mux code so we can
get rid of the old omap1 style code..

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to