On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:14:13PM +0200, Valentin Eduardo (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
wrote:
From: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
Report OMAP2,3,4 data into system_soc_info. Now we get omap
information under /proc/cpuinfo.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
index 37b8a1a..75e36a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
@@ -152,10 +152,15 @@ void __init omap24xx_check_revision(void)
j = i;
}
- pr_info("OMAP%04x", omap_rev() >> 16);
- if ((omap_rev() >> 8) & 0x0f)
- pr_info("ES%x", (omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf);
- pr_info("\n");
+ snprintf(system_soc_info, SYSTEM_SOC_INFO_SIZE, "OMAP%04x",
+ omap_rev() >> 16);
+ if ((omap_rev() >> 8) & 0x0f) {
+ int sz = strlen(system_soc_info);
how about you use the return of the first snprintf instead of asking
strlen() here ? I mean:
int sz = snprintf(system_soc_info, SYSTEM_SOC_INFO_SIZE, "OMAP%04x",
omap_rev() >> 16);
if ((omap_rev() >> 8) & 0x0f)
snprintf(system_soc_info + sz, SYSTEM_SOC_INFO_SIZE - sz,
"ES%x", (omap_rev() >> 12) & 0x0f);
would that work ???
--
balbi
DefectiveByDesign.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
