On 6/15/2010 5:05 PM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
From: Charulatha V<[email protected]>
This patch adds support for handling GPIO as a HWMOD FW adapted
platform device for OMAP2PLUS chips.
gpio_init needs to be done before machine_init functions access gpio APIs.
Hence gpio_init is made as a postcore_initcall.
Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..993995a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+/*
+ * gpio.c - OMAP2PLUS-specific gpio code
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments, Inc.
+ *
+ * Author:
+ * Charulatha V<[email protected]>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include<linux/gpio.h>
+#include<linux/err.h>
+#include<linux/slab.h>
+
+#include<plat/omap_hwmod.h>
+#include<plat/omap_device.h>
+
+static struct omap_device_pm_latency omap_gpio_latency[] = {
+ [0] = {
+ .deactivate_func = omap_device_idle_hwmods,
+ .activate_func = omap_device_enable_hwmods,
+ .flags = OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST,
+ },
+};
+
+static int omap2_init_gpio(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user)
+{
+ struct omap_device *od;
+ struct omap_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
+ char *name = "omap-gpio";
+ static int id;
+ struct omap_gpio_dev_attr *gpio_dev_data;
+
+ if (!oh)
+ pr_err("Could not look up omap gpio %d\n", id + 1);
+
+ pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_gpio_platform_data),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pdata) {
+ pr_err("Memory allocation failed gpio%d\n", id + 1);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ gpio_dev_data = (struct omap_gpio_dev_attr *)oh->dev_attr;
+ pdata->gpio_attr = gpio_dev_data;
+ pdata->method = (int)user;
That method seems to be an IP version specific information and not a Soc
specific one. You should store that in the hwmod dev_attr.
What does 'method' mean in that context? Maybe the name should be revisited?
+ pdata->virtual_irq_start = IH_GPIO_BASE + 32 * id;
+
+ od = omap_device_build(name, id, oh, pdata,
+ sizeof(*pdata), omap_gpio_latency,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(omap_gpio_latency),
+ false);
+ WARN(IS_ERR(od), "Cant build omap_device for %s:%s.\n",
+ name, oh->name);
+
+ id++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init gpio_init(int method)
+{
+ return omap_hwmod_for_each_by_class("gpio", omap2_init_gpio,
+ (void *)method);
+}
+
+/*
+ * gpio_init needs to be done before
+ * machine_init functions access gpio APIs.
+ * Hence gpio_init is a postcore_initcall.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+static int __init omap24xx_gpio_init(void)
+{ if (!cpu_is_omap24xx())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return gpio_init(METHOD_GPIO_24XX);
+}
+postcore_initcall(omap24xx_gpio_init);
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
+static int __init omap3xxx_gpio_init(void)
+{
+ if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return gpio_init(METHOD_GPIO_24XX);
+}
+postcore_initcall(omap3xxx_gpio_init);
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4
+static int __init omap44xx_gpio_init(void)
+{
+ if (!cpu_is_omap44xx())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return gpio_init(METHOD_GPIO_44XX);
+}
You can avoid all this duplication of code by using the dev_attr instead
of using a parameter.
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
