"Govindraj.R" <[email protected]> writes:

> Avoid using hwmod lookup using name string rather
> retreive port info using the hwmod class interface.
>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Govindraj.R <[email protected]>

Govindraj,

I quite like this change, but am still having problems applying it.  I
think it's because of some whitespace differences between our trees.

I manually applied this to do some testing, but can you look into 
what is going on here?  Some thoughts on what is going on below...

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c |   71 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> index 128e19b..0380ac8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> @@ -56,8 +56,6 @@
>   */
>  #define DEFAULT_TIMEOUT 0
>
> -#define MAX_UART_HWMOD_NAME_LEN              16
> -
>  struct omap_uart_state {
>       int num;
>       int can_sleep;
> @@ -601,52 +599,45 @@ static void serial_out_override(struct uart_port *up, 
> int offset, int value)
>  }
>  #endif
>
> -void __init omap_serial_early_init(void)
> +static int omap_serial_port_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user)
>  {
> -     int i = 0;
> +     struct omap_uart_state *uart;
> +     static int i;
>
> -     do {
> -             char oh_name[MAX_UART_HWMOD_NAME_LEN];
> -             struct omap_hwmod *oh;
> -             struct omap_uart_state *uart;
> +     uart = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_uart_state), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (WARN_ON(!uart))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
>
> -             snprintf(oh_name, MAX_UART_HWMOD_NAME_LEN,
> -                      "uart%d", i + 1);
> -             oh = omap_hwmod_lookup(oh_name);
> -             if (!oh)
> -                     break;
> +     uart->oh = oh;
> +     uart->num = i++;
> +     list_add_tail(&uart->node, &uart_list);
> +     num_uarts++;
>

For some reason, all the empty lines that are part of this patch are
missing the leading space.  In a diff, the place where the '+' or '-'
would go on these empty lines normally has a space so that all the lines
are similarily indented.

All of the blank lines in this patch are similarily affected, resulting in
a patch that doesn't apply cleanly.

So you can see what I mean, I've attached a diff that I generated
after manually applying this patch.  If you do a diff between your
patch and the attached patch (using a tool that shows whitespace
differences) you'll see what I mean.

Kevin

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
index da9fee6..d22fca1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
@@ -568,52 +568,45 @@ static void serial_out_override(struct uart_port *up, int 
offset, int value)
 }
 #endif
 
-void __init omap_serial_early_init(void)
+static int omap_serial_port_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user)
 {
-       int i = 0;
+       struct omap_uart_state *uart;
+       static int i;
 
-       do {
-               char oh_name[MAX_UART_HWMOD_NAME_LEN];
-               struct omap_hwmod *oh;
-               struct omap_uart_state *uart;
+       uart = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_uart_state), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (WARN_ON(!uart))
+               return -ENOMEM;
 
-               snprintf(oh_name, MAX_UART_HWMOD_NAME_LEN,
-                        "uart%d", i + 1);
-               oh = omap_hwmod_lookup(oh_name);
-               if (!oh)
-                       break;
+       uart->oh = oh;
+       uart->num = i++;
+       list_add_tail(&uart->node, &uart_list);
+       num_uarts++;
 
-               uart = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_uart_state), GFP_KERNEL);
-               if (WARN_ON(!uart))
-                       return;
+       /*
+        * During UART early init, device need to be probed
+        * to determine SoC specific init before omap_device
+        * is ready.  Therefore, don't allow idle here
+        */
 
-               uart->oh = oh;
-               uart->num = i++;
-               list_add_tail(&uart->node, &uart_list);
-               num_uarts++;
+       uart->oh->flags |= HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE;
 
-               /* 
-                * NOTE: omap_hwmod_init() has not yet been called,
-                *       so no hwmod functions will work yet.
-                */
+       /*
+        * Since UART hwmod is idle/enabled inside the
+        * idle loop, interrupts are already disabled and
+        * thus no locking is needed.  Since the mutex-based
+        * locking in hwmod might sleep, allowing locking
+        * may introduce problems.
+        */
 
-               /* 
-                * During UART early init, device need to be probed
-                * to determine SoC specific init before omap_device
-                * is ready.  Therefore, don't allow idle here
-                */
-               uart->oh->flags |= HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE;
-
-               /* 
-                * Since UART hwmod is idle/enabled inside the
-                * idle loop, interrupts are already disabled and
-                * thus no locking is needed.  Since the mutex-based
-                * locking in hwmod might sleep, allowing locking
-                * may introduce problems.
-                */
-               uart->oh->flags |= HWMOD_NO_IDLE_LOCKING;
+       uart->oh->flags |= HWMOD_NO_IDLE_LOCKING;
 
-       } while (1);
+       return 0;
+}
+
+void __init omap_serial_early_init(void)
+{
+       omap_hwmod_for_each_by_class("uart",
+               omap_serial_port_init, NULL);
 }
 
 /**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to