* Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> [100706 11:40]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 09:57:09AM +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >Sounds like we should first fix thing before adding new code
> >that will make fixing the basic issues harder.
> 
> my idea to deal with this is to have a set of "platform glue
> drivers".  So omap2430.c, blackfin.c, tusb6010 and davinci.c would
> become a platform driver themselves that would instantiate musb-hdrc
> platform_driver and the correct dma driver (inventra, omap, cppi,
> etc).
> 
> It would look something like:
> 
> #include <plat/usb.h>
> 
> static struct musb_hdrc_ops omap2430_musb_ops = {
>       .readb  = generic_readb,
>       .readw  = generic_readw,
>       .readl  = generic_readl,
>       .writeb = generic_writeb,
>       .writew = generic_writew,
>       .writel = generic_writel,
> };
> 
> static struct musb_platform_data omap2430_musb_data = {
>       .ops    = &omap2430_musb_ops,
>       .mode   = -EINVAL,      /* change it later */
> };
> 
> static int __init omap2430_musb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
>       struct omap24030_musb_platform_data pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> 
>       musb = platform_device_alloc("musb-hdrc", -1);
> 
>       /* check error */
> 
>       musb->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>       omap2430_musb_data.mode = pdata->mode;
>       /* initialize every other necessary field */
> 
>       platform_device_add_data(musb, &omap2430_musb_data);
> 
>       dma = platform_device_alloc("dma-inventra", -1);
> 
>       /* check error */
> 
>       dma->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> 
>       /* add both devices */
> 
>       return 0;
> }
> 
> static int omap2430_musb_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                       pm_message_t state)
> {
>       return omap2430_musb_save_context(pdev);
> }
> 
> static int omap2430_musb_resume(stuct platform_device *pdev)
> {
>       omap2430_musb_restore_context(pdev);
> }
> 
> this would allow us to factor-out save/restore context, get rid of
> all exported functions (by just adding every necessary function to
> musb_hdrc_ops) and compile in every single musb file in one driver
> and still have it working. Boards would, then, just instantiate
> musb-omap2430/musb-blackfin/musb-tusb6010/musb-davinci
> platform_driver(s) and the rest would be done on runtime, since only
> the driver that matches would actually probe.
> 
> How does that sound ??

That sounds good to me! It would be nice to have usable musb with
soon-to-be-gone omap3_defconfig :)

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to