On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 08:08:14AM +0200, ext Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> > @@ -648,6 +649,17 @@ int omapfb_ioctl(struct fb_info *fbi, unsigned int cmd,
> > unsigned long arg)
> >                     r = -EFAULT;
> >             break;
> > 
> > +   case FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC:
> > +           if (get_user(p.crt, (__u32 __user *)arg)) {
> > +                   r = -EFAULT;
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +           if (p.crt != 0) {
> > +                   r = -ENODEV;
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +           /* FALLTHROUGH */
> > +
> >     case OMAPFB_WAITFORVSYNC:
> [Hiremath, Vaibhav] I don't see any reason why we should still keep old 
> custom IOCTL support here. 

It can already be used so it should not be removed.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to