> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-omap-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Pandita, Vikram
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 12:39 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Pandita, Vikram
> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fix omap_type() function
> 
> Aim was to get omap_type() function work on omap4.
> In doing so, fixing an issue with is_sram_locked() function.
> 
> Patches tested/verified on omap4 sdp.
> Patches based of latest linus commit: e467e10
> 
> Vikram Pandita (3):
>   omap: sram: fix is_sram_locked check
>   omap4: fix omap_type() function
>   omap4: SRAM start and size change for EMU/HS devices
> 
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap44xx.h |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c                  |   28 ++++++++++++++---------
In summary only fixing " is_sram_locked()" and adding the OMAP_2PLUS is enough.

The control module needs to be fixed in right way because with different bases 
in wakeup and core control modules makes
the current omap_control_read/write break on OMAP4. This is similar problem
what we have on powerdomain base offsets and needs a proper handling.

Fixing one base will break other register acceses
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to