> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kanigeri, Hari
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:20 PM
> To: Linux Omap; Tony Lindgren
> Cc: Shilimkar, Santosh; Cousson, Benoit; Que, Simon; Kanigeri, Hari
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] omap:hwspinlock-added hwspinlock driver
>
> From: Simon Que <s...@ti.com>
>
> Created driver for OMAP hardware spinlock.  This driver supports:
> - Reserved spinlocks for internal use
[sp] How do we reserver the spinlocks? I didn't see any API or parameter
     used to reserve them.
     If this refers to hwspinlock_request_specific(), then it isn't
     really reservation. Reservation is usually is blocks and I would
     expect range input.

     How is this reservation made known to other processors who would
     be attempting to use these spinlocks - in a multi processor scenario
     e.g. OMAP4. Both processors need to be aware of this "reservation".

> - Dynamic allocation of unreserved locks
> - Lock, unlock, and trylock functions, with or without
> disabling irqs/preempt
> - Registered as a platform device driver
>
> The device initialization uses hwmod to configure the devices.
> One device will be created for each IP.  It will pass
> spinlock register offset
> info to the driver.  The device initialization file is:
>               arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlocks.c
>
> The driver takes in register offset info passed in device
> initialization.
> It uses hwmod to obtain the base address of the hardware
> spinlock module.
> Then it reads info from the registers.  The function
> hwspinlock_probe()
> initializes the array of spinlock structures, each containing
> a spinlock
> register address calculated from the base address and lock offsets.
> The device driver file is:
>               arch/arm/plat-omap/hwspinlock.c
>
> Here's an API summary:
> int hwspinlock_lock(struct hwspinlock *);
>       Attempt to lock a hardware spinlock.  If it is busy,
> the function will
>       keep trying until it succeeds.  This is a blocking function.
> int hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *);
>       Attempt to lock a hardware spinlock.  If it is busy,
> the function will
>       return BUSY.  If it succeeds in locking, the function
> will return
>       ACQUIRED.  This is a non-blocking function.
> int hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *);
>       Unlock a hardware spinlock.
>
> struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request(void);
>       Provides for "dynamic allocation" of a hardware
> spinlock.  It returns
>       the handle to the next available (unallocated)
> spinlock.  If no more
>       locks are available, it returns NULL.
> struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request_specific(unsigned int);
>       Provides for "static allocation" of a specific hardware
> spinlock. This
>       allows the system to use a specific spinlock,
> identified by an ID. If
>       the ID is invalid or if the desired lock is already
> allocated, this
>       will return NULL.  Otherwise it returns a spinlock handle.
> int hwspinlock_free(struct hwspinlock *);
>       Frees an allocated hardware spinlock (either reserved
> or unreserved).
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Que <s...@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hari Kanigeri <h-kanige...@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlocks.c            |   70 ++++++
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/hwspinlock.c              |  335
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/hwspinlock.h |   29 +++
>  3 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlocks.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-omap/hwspinlock.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/hwspinlock.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlocks.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlocks.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f0f05e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlocks.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +/*
> + * OMAP hardware spinlock device initialization
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * Contact: Simon Que <s...@ti.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
> useful, but
> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
> + * 02110-1301 USA
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include <plat/hwspinlock.h>
> +#include <plat/omap_device.h>
> +#include <plat/omap_hwmod.h>
> +
> +/* Spinlock register offsets */
> +#define REVISION_OFFSET                      0x0000

[sp] Don't see this being used in the patch.

> +#define SYSCONFIG_OFFSET             0x0010

[sp] Ditto.

> +#define SYSSTATUS_OFFSET             0x0014
> +#define LOCK_BASE_OFFSET             0x0800
> +#define LOCK_OFFSET(i)
> (LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + 0x4 * (i))
> +
> +/* Initialization function */
> +int __init hwspinlocks_init(void)
> +{
> +     int retval = 0;
> +
> +     struct hwspinlock_plat_info *pdata;
> +     struct omap_hwmod *oh;
> +     char *oh_name, *pdev_name;
> +
> +     oh_name = "spinlock";
> +     oh = omap_hwmod_lookup(oh_name);
> +     if (WARN_ON(oh == NULL))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     pdev_name = "hwspinlock";
> +
> +     /* Pass data to device initialization */
> +     pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hwspinlock_plat_info),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (WARN_ON(pdata == NULL))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +     pdata->sysstatus_offset = SYSSTATUS_OFFSET;
> +     pdata->lock_base_offset = LOCK_BASE_OFFSET;
> +
> +     omap_device_build(pdev_name, 0, oh, pdata,
> +                     sizeof(struct hwspinlock_plat_info),
> NULL, 0, false);
> +
> +     return retval;
> +}
> +module_init(hwspinlocks_init);

[sp] Why do we need a separate file for one function?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/hwspinlock.c
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/hwspinlock.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1883add
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/hwspinlock.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
> +/*
> + * OMAP hardware spinlock driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * Contact: Simon Que <s...@ti.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
> useful, but
> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
> + * 02110-1301 USA
> + *
> + * This driver supports:
> + * - Reserved spinlocks for internal use
> + * - Dynamic allocation of unreserved locks
> + * - Lock, unlock, and trylock functions, with or without
> disabling irqs/preempt
> + * - Registered as a platform device driver
> + *
> + * The device initialization uses hwmod to configure the
> devices.  One device
> + * will be created for each IP.  It will pass spinlock
> register offset info to
> + * the driver.  The device initialization file is:
> + *          arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlocks.c
> + *
> + * The driver takes in register offset info passed in device
> initialization.
> + * It uses hwmod to obtain the base address of the hardware
> spinlock module.
> + * Then it reads info from the registers.  The function
> hwspinlock_probe()
> + * initializes the array of spinlock structures, each
> containing a spinlock
> + * register address calculated from the base address and
> lock offsets.
> + *
> + * Here's an API summary:
> + *
> + * int hwspinlock_lock(struct hwspinlock *);
> + *      Attempt to lock a hardware spinlock.  If it is busy,
> the function will
> + *      keep trying until it succeeds.  This is a blocking function.
> + * int hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *);
> + *      Attempt to lock a hardware spinlock.  If it is busy,
> the function will
> + *      return BUSY.  If it succeeds in locking, the
> function will return
> + *      ACQUIRED.  This is a non-blocking function
> + * int hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *);
> + *      Unlock a hardware spinlock.
> + *
> + * struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request(void);
> + *      Provides for "dynamic allocation" of a hardware
> spinlock.  It returns
> + *      the handle to the next available (unallocated)
> spinlock.  If no more
> + *      locks are available, it returns NULL.
> + * struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request_specific(unsigned int);
> + *      Provides for "static allocation" of a specific
> hardware spinlock. This
> + *      allows the system to use a specific spinlock,
> identified by an ID. If
> + *      the ID is invalid or if the desired lock is already
> allocated, this
> + *      will return NULL.  Otherwise it returns a spinlock handle.
> + * int hwspinlock_free(struct hwspinlock *);
> + *      Frees an allocated hardware spinlock (either
> reserved or unreserved).
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +#include <plat/hwspinlock.h>
> +
> +/* Spinlock count code */
> +#define SPINLOCK_32_REGS             1
> +#define SPINLOCK_64_REGS             2
> +#define SPINLOCK_128_REGS            4
> +#define SPINLOCK_256_REGS            8
> +#define SPINLOCK_NUMLOCKS_OFFSET     24

[sp] Shouldn't we combine this offset with other offset definitions?

> +
> +/* for managing a hardware spinlock module */
> +struct hwspinlock_state {
> +     bool is_init;                   /* For first-time
> initialization */
> +     int num_locks;                  /* Total number of
> locks in system */
> +     spinlock_t local_lock;          /* Local protection */
> +     void __iomem *io_base;          /* Mapped base address */
> +};

[sp] The name seems to be misleading. The usage suggest that it
     indicates the module state. We could use suffix _mod_state
     or similar.

> +
> +/* Points to the hardware spinlock module */
> +static struct hwspinlock_state hwspinlock_state;
> +static struct hwspinlock_state *hwspinlock_module =
> &hwspinlock_state;
> +
> +/* Spinlock object */
> +struct hwspinlock {
> +     bool is_init;
> +     int id;
> +     void __iomem *lock_reg;
> +     bool is_allocated;
> +     struct platform_device *pdev;

[sp] 2 different bools for "init" and "allocated" could be avoided
     by a "state" field with possible values as xx_RESET, xx_INIT,
     xx_ALLOC, ...

> +};
> +
> +/* Array of spinlocks */
> +static struct hwspinlock *hwspinlocks;

[sp] Do we really want to stress the compilers by making the
     name of structure and variable to be same? This situation
     is avoidable.

> +
> +/* API functions */
> +
> +/* Busy loop to acquire a spinlock */
> +int hwspinlock_lock(struct hwspinlock *handle)
> +{
> +     int retval;
> +
> +     if (WARN_ON(handle == NULL))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (WARN_ON(in_irq()))
> +             return -EPERM;
> +
> +     if (pm_runtime_get(&handle->pdev->dev) < 0)
> +             return -ENODEV;

[sp] I may be missing discussions on this list; but
     can you confirm if pm_runtime_get()/put() are
     waiting to be merged on the master branch.

> +
> +     /* Attempt to acquire the lock by reading from it */
> +     do {
> +             retval = readl(handle->lock_reg);
> +     } while (retval == HWSPINLOCK_BUSY);

[sp] The description did say that call is blocking but this
     tight-loop could lead to deadlock situations.
     Do we intend it this way?

> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hwspinlock_lock);
> +
> +/* Attempt to acquire a spinlock once */
> +int hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *handle)
> +{
> +     int retval = 0;
> +
> +     if (WARN_ON(handle == NULL))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (WARN_ON(in_irq()))
> +             return -EPERM;

[sp] Would be good to add a comment - why it is not permitted?

> +
> +     if (pm_runtime_get(&handle->pdev->dev) < 0)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     /* Attempt to acquire the lock by reading from it */
> +     retval = readl(handle->lock_reg);
> +
> +     if (retval == HWSPINLOCK_BUSY)
> +             pm_runtime_put(&handle->pdev->dev);
> +
> +     return retval;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hwspinlock_trylock);
> +
> +/* Release a spinlock */
> +int hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *handle)
> +{
> +     if (WARN_ON(handle == NULL))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     /* Release it by writing 0 to it */
> +     writel(0, handle->lock_reg);
> +
> +     pm_runtime_put(&handle->pdev->dev);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hwspinlock_unlock);
> +
> +/* Request an unclaimed spinlock */
> +struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request(void)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +     bool found = false;
> +     struct hwspinlock *handle = NULL;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +
> +     spin_lock_irqsave(&hwspinlock_module->local_lock, flags);
> +     /* Search for an unclaimed, unreserved lock */
> +     for (i = 0; i < hwspinlock_module->num_locks && !found; i++) {
> +             if (!hwspinlocks[i].is_allocated) {
> +                     found = true;
> +                     handle = &hwspinlocks[i];
> +             }
> +     }
> +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwspinlock_module->local_lock, flags);
> +
> +     /* Return error if no more locks available */
> +     if (!found)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     handle->is_allocated = true;
> +
> +     return handle;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hwspinlock_request);
> +
> +/* Request an unclaimed spinlock by ID */
> +struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request_specific(unsigned int id)
> +{
> +     struct hwspinlock *handle = NULL;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +
> +     spin_lock_irqsave(&hwspinlock_module->local_lock, flags);
> +
> +     if (WARN_ON(hwspinlocks[id].is_allocated))
> +             goto exit;
> +
> +     handle = &hwspinlocks[id];
> +     handle->is_allocated = true;
> +
> +exit:
> +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwspinlock_module->local_lock, flags);
> +     return handle;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hwspinlock_request_specific);
> +
> +/* Release a claimed spinlock */
> +int hwspinlock_free(struct hwspinlock *handle)
> +{
> +     if (WARN_ON(handle == NULL))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (WARN_ON(!handle->is_allocated))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     handle->is_allocated = false;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hwspinlock_free);
> +
> +/* Probe function */
> +static int __devinit hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct hwspinlock_plat_info *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +     struct resource *res;
> +     void __iomem *io_base;
> +     int id;
> +
> +     void __iomem *sysstatus_reg;
> +
> +     /* Determine number of locks */
> +     sysstatus_reg = ioremap(OMAP44XX_SPINLOCK_BASE +
> +
> pdata->sysstatus_offset, sizeof(u32));

[sp] Is this the only place where sysstatus_reg is used? If so,
     do we really need to pass it via pdata?

> +     switch (readl(sysstatus_reg) >> SPINLOCK_NUMLOCKS_OFFSET) {

[sp] ioremap() is not guaranteed to succeed. Check if return value
     is valid before using it.

> +     case SPINLOCK_32_REGS:
> +             hwspinlock_module->num_locks = 32;
> +             break;
> +     case SPINLOCK_64_REGS:
> +             hwspinlock_module->num_locks = 64;
> +             break;
> +     case SPINLOCK_128_REGS:
> +             hwspinlock_module->num_locks = 128;
> +             break;
> +     case SPINLOCK_256_REGS:
> +             hwspinlock_module->num_locks = 256;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             return -EINVAL; /* Invalid spinlock count code */
> +     }
> +     iounmap(sysstatus_reg);
> +
> +     /* Allocate spinlock device objects */
> +     hwspinlocks = kmalloc(sizeof(struct hwspinlock) *
> +                     hwspinlock_module->num_locks, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (WARN_ON(hwspinlocks == NULL))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     /* Initialize local lock */
> +     spin_lock_init(&hwspinlock_module->local_lock);
> +
> +     /* Get address info */
> +     res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +
> +     /* Map spinlock module address space */
> +     io_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> +     hwspinlock_module->io_base = io_base;
> +
> +     /* Set up each individual lock handle */
> +     for (id = 0; id < hwspinlock_module->num_locks; id++) {
> +             hwspinlocks[id].id              = id;
> +             hwspinlocks[id].pdev            = pdev;
> +
> +             hwspinlocks[id].is_init         = true;
> +             hwspinlocks[id].is_allocated    = false;
> +
> +             hwspinlocks[id].lock_reg        = io_base + pdata->
> +                                     lock_base_offset +
> sizeof(u32) * id;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver hwspinlock_driver = {
> +     .probe          = hwspinlock_probe,
> +     .driver         = {
> +             .name   = "hwspinlock",
> +     },
> +};
> +
> +/* Initialization function */
> +static int __init hwspinlock_init(void)
> +{
> +     int retval = 0;
> +
> +     /* Register spinlock driver */
> +     retval = platform_driver_register(&hwspinlock_driver);
> +
> +     return retval;
> +}
> +
> +/* Cleanup function */
> +static void __exit hwspinlock_exit(void)
> +{
> +     int id;
> +
> +     platform_driver_unregister(&hwspinlock_driver);
> +
> +     for (id = 0; id < hwspinlock_module->num_locks; id++)
> +             hwspinlocks[id].is_init = false;
> +     iounmap(hwspinlock_module->io_base);
> +
> +     /* Free spinlock device objects */
> +     if (hwspinlock_module->is_init)
> +             kfree(hwspinlocks);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(hwspinlock_init);
> +module_exit(hwspinlock_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Hardware spinlock driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Simon Que");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Hari Kanigeri");
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/hwspinlock.h
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/hwspinlock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8c69ca5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/hwspinlock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +/* hwspinlock.h */
> +
> +#ifndef HWSPINLOCK_H
> +#define HWSPINLOCK_H
> +

[sp] License is missing

> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <plat/omap44xx.h>
> +
> +/* Read values from the spinlock register */
> +#define HWSPINLOCK_ACQUIRED 0
> +#define HWSPINLOCK_BUSY 1

[sp] What is the value after initialization?
     Also, what is the difference between acquired and busy?
     If a spinlock is acquired, won't it be busy? OR vice-versa?

> +
> +/* Device data */
> +struct hwspinlock_plat_info {
> +     u32 sysstatus_offset;           /* System status
> register offset */
> +     u32 lock_base_offset;           /* Offset of spinlock
> registers */
> +};
> +
> +struct hwspinlock;

[sp] Any specific reason for forward declaration?

> +
> +int hwspinlock_lock(struct hwspinlock *handle);
> +int hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *handle);
> +int hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *handle);
> +
> +struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request(void);
> +struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_request_specific(unsigned int id);
> +int hwspinlock_free(struct hwspinlock *hwspinlock_ptr);
> +
> +#endif /* HWSPINLOCK_H */
> --
> 1.7.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to