[snip] > > > > [sp] This explains. And my earlier comment was to update the > description with need for change. I believe quick summary > the discussion above will be good for the patch. >
Okay, will do. But what am is supposed to add more in the summary? Should I add how sysfs_streq is a better choice over strcmp? Or should I emphasize more how the false positive scenario can occur with strncmp? Thanks, Archit-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
