On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:13:04 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Otherwise the wrong initcalls can run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2xxx.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/emu.c | 3 +++
May I ask what stopped you from CCing me on this patch?
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2xxx.c
> index 43e7404..1a31b72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2xxx.c
> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static int __init omap2_clk_arch_init(void)
> struct clk *virt_prcm_set, *sys_ck, *dpll_ck, *mpu_ck;
> unsigned long sys_ck_rate;
>
> - if (!mpurate)
> + if (!(cpu_is_omap24xx() && mpurate))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> virt_prcm_set = clk_get(NULL, "virt_prcm_set");
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
> index f485a89..03720bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int __init omap2_clk_arch_init(void)
> struct clk *osc_sys_ck, *dpll1_ck, *arm_fck, *core_ck;
> unsigned long osc_sys_rate;
>
> - if (!mpurate)
> + if (!(cpu_is_omap34xx() && mpurate))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* XXX test these for success */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/emu.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/emu.c
> index ec0d984..9c442e2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/emu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/emu.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ static struct amba_device omap3_etm_device = {
>
> static int __init emu_init(void)
> {
> + if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> amba_device_register(&omap3_etb_device, &iomem_resource);
> amba_device_register(&omap3_etm_device, &iomem_resource);
>
>
>
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
