Hi, * Roger Quadros <[email protected]> [100819 17:17]: > On 08/19/2010 04:09 PM, Krogerus Heikki (EXT-Teleca/Helsinki) wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:40:42PM +0200, ext Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >>On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:09:37PM +0300, Krogerus Heikki > >>(EXT-Teleca/Helsinki) wrote: > >>>@@ -909,5 +913,6 @@ void __init rx51_peripherals_init(void) > >>> spi_register_board_info(rx51_peripherals_spi_board_info, > >>> ARRAY_SIZE(rx51_peripherals_spi_board_info)); > >>> omap2_hsmmc_init(mmc); > >>>+ platform_device_register(&rx51_charger_device); > >> > >>Maybe > >> > >> platform_device_register_simple("isp1704_charger", -1, NULL, 0); > > > >I guess it's enough in this case. Ameya, Roger, any objections? > > > I'm fine with the current approach. No need to re-spin.
Just checking.. Anton, can you please queue up this 2/2 patch too to keep them together? Here's my ack: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
