> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 7:36 PM
> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Balbi Felipe (Nokia-
> MS/Helsinki)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH-V2 1/3] RTC:s35390a: Add Alarm interrupt support
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:30:27PM +0200, ext [email protected] wrote:
> >+static irqreturn_t s35390a_irq_thread(int irq, void *handle)
> >+{
> >+    char buf[1];
> >+    struct s35390a *s35390a = handle;
> >+    struct i2c_client *client = s35390a->client[0];
> 
> don't you need some locking on the irq handler ? a mutex maybe ? Just
> wondering...
> 
[Hiremath, Vaibhav] Yes definitely we do need locking here, I thought of adding 
locking mechanism in subsequent patch, does it makes sense?


> >@@ -261,15 +424,30 @@ static int s35390a_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >     if (s35390a_get_datetime(client, &tm) < 0)
> >             dev_warn(&client->dev, "clock needs to be set\n");
> >
> >+    if (client->irq >= 0) {
> >+            err = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
> >+                            s35390a_irq_thread,
> >+                            IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> >+                            client->name, s35390a);
> >+            if (err) {
> >+                    dev_err(&client->dev, "unable to request IRQ\n");
> >+                    goto exit_dummy;
> >+            }
> >+    }
> >+
> >     s35390a->rtc = rtc_device_register(s35390a_driver.driver.name,
> >                             &client->dev, &s35390a_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> >
> >     if (IS_ERR(s35390a->rtc)) {
> >             err = PTR_ERR(s35390a->rtc);
> >-            goto exit_dummy;
> >+            goto exit_intr;
> >     }
> >+
> >     return 0;
> >
> >+exit_intr:
> >+    free_irq(client->irq, client);
> 
> free_irq() won't behave correctly, I believe since you're passing
> different dev_id parameters. If you look at the implementation of
> free_irq() you'll see it uses dev_id to find the correct struct
> irqaction pointer.
> 
[Hiremath, Vaibhav] Overlooked, my bad. Thanks for pointing this to me ,will 
fix.


Thanks,
Vaibhav
> --
> balbi
> 
> DefectiveByDesign.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to