Tony, > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-omap- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:17 AM > To: Kevin Hilman > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED > instead of MT_DEVICE > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:07 AM > > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED > > instead of MT_DEVICE > > > > Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Santosh Shilimkar > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section > > >> mapping pre-requisite instead of intended MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED > > >> > > >> Since the section mapping limitation gets fixed with first > > >> patch in this series, the MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED can be used now. > > >> > > >> Have not tested this, so somebody with Davinci hardware can > > >> try this out > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]> > > >> Cc: [email protected] > > >> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> > > > > > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> > > > > Also, FYI... while not a very thorough test, I boot-tested this series > > on DaVinci (dm355, omapl138) and it worked fine. > > > > I'll include in davinci git (in the davinci-testing branch) so it gets a > > bit more testing. > > Thanks a lot Kevin!! > > Tony, > Can you merge this in lo master as well. Actually I want all these > 3 patches go together so that it doesn't break OMAP/DAVINCI. > Ping
Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
