Hi,

I was reworking some patches, I saw 2 functions in manager.c:

dss_mgr_wait_for_go() and dss_mgr_wait_for_go_ovl() both
define the var "enum omap_channel channel;" but don't use it.

Is there any reason this is done, or is it just stray code?

Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 07:30 +0200, ext Archit Taneja wrote:
>> Calls init functions of dss_features during dss_probe, and the
>> following features are made omapxxxx independent:
>>   - number of managers, overlays
>>   - supported color modes for each overlay
>>   - supported displays for each manager
>>   - global aplha, and restriction of global alpha for video1 pipeline
>>   - The register field ranges : FIRHINC, FIRVINC, FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD
>>     FIFOLOWTHRESHOLD and FIFOSIZE
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <arc...@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/display.h |   31 ----------------
>>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c            |    3 ++
>>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c           |   56
>>  ++++++++++++++++------------- drivers/video/omap2/dss/manager.c         |  
>>  33 ++++++++--------- drivers/video/omap2/dss/overlay.c         |   24
>>  +++++------- 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> 
> snip
> 
>>  static void _dispc_setup_global_alpha(enum omap_plane plane, u8
>> global_alpha)  { -
>> -       BUG_ON(plane == OMAP_DSS_VIDEO1);
>> -
>> -       if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>> +       if (!dss_has_feature(FEAT_GLOBAL_ALPHA))
>>                 return;
>> 
>> +       BUG_ON(!dss_has_feature(FEAT_GLOBAL_ALPHA_VID1) &&
>> +                       plane == OMAP_DSS_VIDEO1);
>> +
>>         if (plane == OMAP_DSS_GFX)
>>                 REG_FLD_MOD(DISPC_GLOBAL_ALPHA, global_alpha, 7, 0);
>>         else if (plane == OMAP_DSS_VIDEO2) @@ -949,17 +950,14 @@
>> static void dispc_read_plane_fifo_sizes(void)
>> 
> DISPC_VID_FIFO_SIZE_STATUS(1) };
>>         u32 size;
>>         int plane;
>> +       u8 size1, size2;
> 
> You have a bit inconsistent naming with these. The function
> is defined as accepting start and end, here you use size1 and size2, below
> you have foo1 and foo2.
> 
> Size is not a good name, as it's not size at all. Perhaps
> foo_start and foo_end (or just start and end if there's only
> one feat being used)? Or foo_msb and foo_lsb (as in most/least significant
> bit)? 
> 
> Otherwise looks good.
> 
>  Tomi--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to