> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:40 PM
> To: Linus Walleij
> Cc: Kevin Hilman; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] OMAP: introduce OPP layer for device-specific
> OPPs
> 
> Linus Walleij had written, on 09/16/2010 12:07 PM, the following:
> > 2010/9/16 Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>:
> >
> >> lib/opp/* seems more appropriate to me with the header at
> >> include/linux/opp.h as Linus suggested.
> >
> > I second this. I would love to see the generic OPP stuff in
> > lib/opp/* so we put it in the right place from the beginning and
> > don't have to painfully refactor everything later (clk.h
> > especially comes to mind.)
> cool.. digging a bit deeper into lib directory, I propose the following:
> lib/opp.c
> include/linux/opp.h
> 
> any soc specific data (for registration etc) -> goes to
> arch/<arch>/mach-<soc>/oppdata_xyz.c or what ever they choose
> 
> the intent being lib/ is no place to put mach or arch specific data
> definitions.. it is just noise..
> 
> if folks are ok with this, will post a new rev soonish..
> 
If you like may be you can take this thread over lkml just to get more
wider perspective
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to