> -----Original Message----- > From: Menon, Nishanth > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 3:48 PM > To: Shilimkar, Santosh; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PATCH 11/14] omap4: Fix silicon version detection for early > samples > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-omap- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh > > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:48 AM > > [..] > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c > > index ae70ae9..0412233 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c > > @@ -308,6 +308,15 @@ static void __init omap4_check_revision(void) > > hawkeye = (idcode >> 12) & 0xffff; > > rev = (idcode >> 28) & 0xff; > > > > + /* > > + * Few initial ES2.0 samples IDCODE is same as ES1.0 > > + * Use ARM register to detect the correct ES version > > + */ > > + if (!rev) { > > + idcode = read_cpuid(CPUID_ID); > > + rev = (idcode & 0xf) - 1; > > + } > > + > > Squash this to patch 10? > Actually this was kind of temporary patch and was suppose to be reverted later and hence I kept it separate. Felipe, benoit suggested to have this change anyways considering it's just one check. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg34521.html
But now I think we can fold this into id patch itself. Will fold it into patch 10. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
