On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 14:20 +0200, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:17:33AM -0500, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 13:45 +0200, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:20:03AM -0500, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >> > static struct mtd_partition omap3beagle_nand_partitions[] = {
> >> >@@ -163,12 +168,25 @@ static void __init beagle_display_init(void)
> >> >
> >> > #include "sdram-micron-mt46h32m32lf-6.h"
> >> >
> >> >+struct wl12xx_platform_data omap_beagle_wlan_data __initdata = {
> >> >+ .irq = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OMAP_BEAGLE_WLAN_IRQ_GPIO),
> >>
> >> can you pass IRQ as a struct resource ?
> >
> >Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here. Can you clarify?
>
> static struct resource wl12xx_resource[] = {
> {
> .start = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OMAP_BEAGLE_WLAN_IRQ_GPIO),
> .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> },
> };
>
> static struct platform_device wl12xx_platform_device = {
> .resource = wl12xx_resource,
> .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wl12xx_resource),
> .....
> };
>
> then on driver you would:
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>
> something like that :-)
Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation. I guess we could do that in a
separate patch. The zoom board file already uses this .irq element, so
this patch would not be the appropriate place to change it.
Is it okay if I deal with that after I'm done with the current patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
