Hi Sergio,
Aguirre, Sergio wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>>
...
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2)
>> + else if (cpu_is_omap2430()) {
>> + list = omap2_mboxes;
>> +
>> + list[0]->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "dsp");
>> + } else if (cpu_is_omap2420()) {
>
> Isn't both 2430 and 2420 doing the exact same?
>
Code is not the same, it is 2 line which apply for both but couldn't find an
easy way of making them share the request for dsp mailbox without changing more
code, perhaps a macro to detect if omap2 and then a nested if for the 2420
case, but since HWMOD should handle it better, I left it as is.
As the code previous to reorganization treated 2430 has a user with one single
mailbox (same as omap3) I added the code to at least detect it, 2420 has 2
mailboxes one for iva and other for the dsp. From the diagrams for OMAP2430[1]
and OMAP2420[2], it made sense as in the later both dsp and iva seem to be
separated entities; unfortunately I don't have the hardware to test on any of
them.
The patched code should look like:
#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2)
else if (cpu_is_omap2430()) {
list = omap2_mboxes;
list[0]->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "dsp");
} else if (cpu_is_omap2420()) {
list = omap2_mboxes;
list[0]->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "dsp");
list[1]->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "iva");
}
#endif
Regards,
Omar
---
[1]
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?contentId=4672&navigationId=12609&templateId=6123
[2]
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=6123&navigationId=11990&contentId=4671--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
