Hi,

[...]
> > +   devconf2 &= ~CONF2_OTGMODE;
> > +   switch (musb_mode) {
> > +#ifdef     CONFIG_USB_MUSB_OTG
> > +   case MUSB_OTG:          /* Don't override the VBUS/ID comparators */
> > +           devconf2 |= CONF2_NO_OVERRIDE;
> 
> This does nothing, can be removed...

Yes, but it's good to have it from code readability perspective.

I can remove it but let's get Felipe's opinion on this.

[...] 
> > +   if (musb->set_clock)
> > +           musb->set_clock(musb->clock, 0);
> > +   else
> > +           clk_disable(musb->clock);
> > +
> > +   otg_fck = clk_get(musb->controller, "fck");
> > +   if (IS_ERR(otg_fck)) {
> > +           DBG(2, "clk_get() failed for otg_fck.\n");
> > +   } else {
> > +           clk_put(otg_fck);
> > +           clk_put(otg_fck);
> > +           clk_disable(otg_fck);
> 
> I think the order should be:
> clk_disable(...);
> clk_put(...);

Again I would wait for Felipe's opinion on this ordering. BTW there
Are codes on musb_core.c where clk_put is done before clk_disable().

>> And of course, it should be put only once... ;)
No. clk_put() needs to be done twice as clk_get() is called two times;
one in musb_platform_init() and other in current function musb_platform_exit.

Other solution could be to save otg_fck in some static variable as
Sergei suggested.

Thanks,
Ajay
> 
[...]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to