>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Varadarajan, Charulatha
>>Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:09 AM
>>To: Gopinath, Thara; [email protected]
>>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Cousson, Benoit; Sripathy,
>>Vishwanath; Sawant, Anand
>>Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding smartreflex device file.
>>
>>Thara,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gopinath, Thara
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 9:41 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Cousson,
>>> Benoit; Sripathy, Vishwanath; Sawant, Anand; Gopinath, Thara
>>> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding smartreflex device file.
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for device registration of various
>>> smartreflex module present in the system. This patch introduces
>>> the platform data for smartreflex devices which include
>>> the efused and test n-target vaules, module enable/disable
>>> pointers and a parameter to indicate whether smartreflex
>>> autocompensation needs to be enabled on init or not.
>>> Currently auocompensation is enabled on init by default
>>> for OMAP3430 ES3.1 chip.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile    |    2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c |  177
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
>>>
>>
>><<snip>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +static int sr_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user)
>>
>>Since *user is unused, you may rename it to *unused

Ok will do.

>>
>>> +{
>>> +   struct omap_sr_data *sr_data;
>>> +   struct omap_sr_dev_data *sr_dev_data;
>>> +   struct omap_device *od;
>>> +   char *name = "smartreflex";
>>> +   static int i;
>>> +
>>> +   sr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_sr_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +   if (!sr_data) {
>>> +           pr_err("%s: Unable to allocate memory for %s
>>> sr_data.Error!\n",
>>> +                   __func__, oh->name);
>>> +           return -ENOMEM;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   sr_dev_data = (struct omap_sr_dev_data *)oh->dev_attr;
>>> +   if (unlikely(!sr_dev_data)) {
>>> +           pr_err("%s: dev atrribute is NULL\n", __func__);
>>> +           goto exit;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   /*
>>> +    * OMAP3430 ES3.1 chips by default come with Efuse burnt
>>> +    * with parameters required for full functionality of
>>> +    * smartreflex AVS feature like ntarget values , sennenable
>>> +    * and senpenable. So enable the SR AVS feature during boot up
>>> +    * itself if it is a OMAP3430 ES3.1 chip.
>>> +    */
>>> +   sr_data->enable_on_init = false;
>>> +   if (cpu_is_omap343x())
>>> +           if (omap_rev() == OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1)
>>> +                   sr_data->enable_on_init = true;
>>> +
>>> +   sr_data->voltdm =
>>> omap_voltage_domain_lookup(sr_dev_data->vdd_name);
>>> +   if (IS_ERR(sr_data->voltdm)) {
>>> +           pr_err("%s: Unable to get voltage domain
>>> pointer for VDD %s\n",
>>> +                   __func__, sr_dev_data->vdd_name);
>>> +           goto exit;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   sr_dev_data->volts_supported = omap_voltage_get_volttable(
>>> +                   sr_data->voltdm, &sr_dev_data->volt_data);
>>> +   if (!sr_dev_data->volts_supported) {
>>> +           pr_warning("%s: No Voltage table registerd fo VDD%d."
>>> +                   "Something really wrong\n\n", __func__, i + 1);
>>> +           goto exit;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   sr_set_nvalues(sr_dev_data, sr_data);
>>> +
>>> +   od = omap_device_build(name, i, oh, sr_data, sizeof(*sr_data),
>>> +                          omap_sr_latency,
>>> +                          ARRAY_SIZE(omap_sr_latency), 0);
>>
>>Patch 4 should come before patch 3 in the series. Otherwise, this
>>would fail during a git-bisect.

Why?? All patches individually compile and boot.

>>
>>> +   if (IS_ERR(od))
>>> +           pr_warning("%s: Could not build omap_device for
>>> %s: %s.\n\n",
>>> +                   __func__, name, oh->name);
>>
>>Return error.
>>
>>> +exit:
>>> +   i++;
>>> +   kfree(sr_data);
>>> +   return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __init omap_devinit_smartreflex(void)
>>> +{
>>> +   return omap_hwmod_for_each_by_class("smartreflex",
>>> sr_dev_init, NULL);
>>> +}
>>> +device_initcall(omap_devinit_smartreflex);
>>> --
>>> 1.7.0.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>> linux-omap" in
>>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to