2010/11/2 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Mark Brown
>> <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:14:13AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >
>> >>  config REGULATOR_TWL4030
>> >>       bool "TI TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030/TPS695x0 PMIC"
>> >>       depends on TWL4030_CORE
>> >> +     default y
>> >>       help
>> >>         This driver supports the voltage regulators provided by
>> >>         this family of companion chips.
>> >
>> > This default is not suitable for non-OMAP platforms, it should be
>> > conditional on OMAP or something if we're going to do this (though
>> > generally we handle this with defconfigs rather than in Kconfig).
>>
>> This would only be enabled when TWL4030_CORE is enabled, so non-OMAP
>> platforms would not get affected.
> Well, all platforms that have TWL4030_CORE will get REGULATOR_TWL4030 by
> default, too.  (TWL4030_CORE doesn't depend on something omapish.)

Yes, I think TWL4030_CORE should depend on OMAP3, but I think some
people might not like that. That's why I wanted to make that a
separate patch.

> For me this looks OK.  It would be still better if it removed
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_TWL4030=y from arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig.

Yes, but I want to run 'make savedefconfig'; there's many changes
lingering like that.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to