Hello Manju,

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:[email protected]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 4:45 AM

> Requirement is - switch to no standby for short time and should be
> reverted back to original standby mode. 
> All the combinations are not required.

OK, good.

> > 2.  Rather than just using a single omap_device_mstandby() 
> > function call, 
> > I'd rather see something like omap_device_require_no_standby() and 
> > omap_device_release_no_standby(). 
> 
> s/standby/mstandby ?

Thanks, that makes more sense.

> > omap_device_require_no_standby() would 
> > force the initiator port into no-standby.  
> > omap_device_release_no_standby() would return the initiator port 
> > MSTANDBYMODE to whatever the state should be (this depends on whether 
> > HWMOD_SWSUP_MSTDBY is set). 
>  
> How do we get previous stand by state in this API since standby mode is 
> changed with "omap_device_require_no_standby"

I don't think it is needed.  The API is only valid while the hwmod is 
enabled, I think.  So *require_no_mstandby() would force the hwmod into 
no-MSTANDBY mode, and *release_no_mstandby() would place it into smart 
standby if HWMOD_SWSUP_MSTDBY is not set, and no standby if it is set.

- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to