On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > We notice that when system wake up from OFF mode, then CS is in inactive > state until the first SPI transfer. > For our design it lead to some conflict on this I/O. > Inactive state for CS when there is no transfer should be the correct > behavior: this is the purpose of these patches. > > * Change from v3: > Patch clean-up according to Kevin Hilman and checkpatch. > Now force CS to be in inactive state only if it was inactive when it was > suspended. > > Gregory CLEMENT (1): > OMAP2: Spi: Force CS to be in inactive state after off-mode > transition > > drivers/spi/omap2_mcspi.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hi Gregory, If you've only got one patch then please put all the explanation text into the patch description. Using a cover letter like this is only useful when describing the context for a series (more than 1) of patches. Also, revision history should always be in patch description, regardless of whether or not there is a cover letter (at least for the subsystems that I maintain. Otherwise, it is too easy for vital information to get separated from the patch. Thanks, g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
