On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:50:24PM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
> 
> Also, don't be picky about the location, which incidentally fixes the
> build since MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT is gone on 2.6.37.

That comment is wrong.  memblock_alloc() is still as picky as the
original.

phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
{
        return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
}

        /* Pump up max_addr */
        if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
                end = memblock.current_limit;

and current_limit is initialized to what was MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT.  So,
memblock_alloc() will always allocate from lowmem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to