* Pedanekar, Hemant <[email protected]> [101210 16:58]:
> Tony Lindgren wrote on Monday, December 06, 2010 10:23 PM:
>
> [...]
> >> Similarly, we will also need to add TI816X specific hwmods.
> >>
> >> 4) TI816X series shares similarity with OMAP4 too - e.g., various IPs are
> >> same, CM module is closer to OMAP4 than OMAP3. Thus, regaring (1) above, I
> >> could use OMAP4 code instead of adding new "else if". Of course, again,
> >> there are above mentioned differences too.
> >
> > We really want to use same code for the shared modules so
> > using feature
> > based detection is the way to go.
> >
> Tony,
>
> Just wanted to confirm: so you are suggesting we do not have any
> cpu_is_ti81xx() check in the code - is that correct?
We can have that, but we should avoid it where possible.
And ideally cpu_is_ti81xx() would be just something like:
#define cpu_is_ti81xx() \\
cpu_is_omap34xx() && omap_has_aaa() && omap_has_bbb()
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
