Hello. On 03-01-2011 23:44, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Moreover, even Felipe also seems to move other musb > DMAs (Inventra, CPPI3.0, TUSB) to drivers/dma.
Frankly speaking, I doubt that drivers/dma/ will have place for the purely MUSB specific DMA engines such as the named ones (there's no TUSB DMA BTW it uses OMAP DMA).
I think we will get more clarity once we start on this activity.
I agree, but I personally don't see that many limiting factors. dmaengine is just a generic API for doing DMA transfers. If it's not enough for us currently, we extend it.
Putting MUSB DMA enignes into drivers/dma/ is the same as taking *any* chip capable of bus-mastering DMA, "separating" its bus mastering related code from its driver and putting this code into drivers/dma/. This doesn't make sense, in my opinion. drivers/dma/ is for the dedicated DMA controllers (which can *optionally* serve the slave devices).
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
